Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie (2024)

Tamil Reviews

Despite the compromises in the second half, Mari Selvaraj’s third film remains powerful, proving to be a testament to how his voice remains the loudest

Udhayanidhi Stalin and Vadivelu in Maamannan

Director: Mari Selvaraj

Writer: Mari Selvaraj

Cast: Vadivelu, Udhayanidhi Stalin, Fahadh Faasil, Keerthy Suresh

There couldn’t have been a better opening stretch for a film that speaks the language ofMaamannan. An elaborate intercut sequence binds the two worlds that co-exist within the same Salem. On one end, you see Rathnavel (Fahadh Faasil) preparing a small army of dogs for a race. This is then intercut with Veeran’s (Udayanidhi) backyard where we see him feeding his pigs. The dogs don’t live in a kennel, but in a mansion most humans would find luxurious. And at the other end of the town, Veeran’s pigs live in a muddy sty, moving around freely. At first, you’d likely think the dog and the pig are metaphors representing Rathnavel and Veeran respectively and this may very well be true too but only partly. The animals, in true Mari Selvaraj fashion, come to mean a lot more with each passing minute.

For Rathnavel, these dogs represent a part of his ego. The care he provides for them extends only until they continue to win him races. As for Veeran, the love for pigs is true and unconditional, something that is linked to his very existence. You also see a reflection of this mindset in the way both of them look at people. Given how it is a movie set during an election, you realise how Rathnavel looks at people in his constituency as either votes or vote banks. He has the backing of his caste and he plans to win the election using the same ego and caste pride as his weapons. And for Veeran, there’s no strategy at play except good governance and equality. Yet by the half-way mark, this subversion has worked to such an extent that it has already changed the way we look at pigs (the ‘Panninga Than Kootama Varum’line fromSivajimeans something else right now).

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie (2)

Fahadh Faasil in Maamannan

The film works just as well when we think about it as a study of two generations. We understand this when we further compare Rathnavel to Veeran and the families they come from. But this becomes even clearer when we see how differently Veeran reacts to a problem compared to his father Maamannan (Vadivelu), who is also an MLA. One of the best echo scenes in the movie comes when a set of Veeran’s friends come home for a visit. At first, they greet Maamannan the same way they would when an elder enters their own families. Yet Maamannan corrects them twice and insists that they must sit even when they’re speaking to someone older or more powerful. We only understand the meaning of this scene later when Maamannan himself refuses to sit when he’s in the presence of Rathnavel.

This double standard — the fact that Maamannan himself is not able to practise what he has preached — results in the film’s most fascinating equation and the best interval in recent times. It also reflects how the educated second generation in a family like Maamannan’s does not accept the status quo. Just like how the poster ofThevar Magan(1992) placed right next to that ofMaamannan’sreveals the father and son sitting right next to each other when compared to the son standing in the older film, the film puts forth its politics in the massiest manner one can think of.

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie (3)

Vadivelu and Udhayanidhi Stalin in Maamannan

The second great echo scene comes in the way we see Rathnavel going forward with two different ‘executions’. Staged in very similar ways using the same location and camera angles, we understand how Rathnavel’s mind works almost entirely because both murders and victims appear to be indistinguishable, at least to him.

All this results in an extremely solid first half that plays out as an intense character study of three men. It is personal, intricate and political even without having to introduce us to many characters outside the three of them. Yet you also find the film losing that balance as it moves into the realm of the aforementioned election. From personal, the film soon becomes ‘public’ with individual plot points making way for larger, more generic situations. The intensity too starts to drop once the film shifts to this mood.

Except for one scene in which a large group of youngsters guarantee their support to Maamannan and Veeran, we don’t really sense the positive change the duo has had on the people either. Even otherwise, it’s always much harder to maintain high levels of drama during long stretches where the actual election process is taking place. What this does is urge us to wait for scenes in which Rathnavel meets Veeran again because that’s the space in which the film retains the tension it was able to build earlier on. And because the film is eventually about the rise of Maamannan with the help of his son Veeran, it cannot organically accommodate ‘mass’ scenes that are written around Veeran alone. So when Veeran gets a fight scene, almost out of nowhere, you don’t really understand why it had to be placed at that point. It works neither as a part of Rathnavel’s sly political trickery nor does it work as a solo mass moment for its hero.

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie (4)

Vadivelu and Udhayanidhi Stalin in Maamannan

Yet the reason why the film never slips is because the performances remain steady and strong. Udayanidhi himself is earnest and original, even in the film’s most dramatic moments, but its the equation between Fahadh and Vadivelu that continues to keep it all together. Fahadh presents us with one the best villains of recent times; unhinged, unpredictable and with a raw energy that makes him extremely stressful to watch.

Vadivelu too isn’t just brilliant in the scenes that are written around his performance. For instance, he slants his head very subtly when he understands the real intention behind his senior’s silence on a major political issue, expressing his character’s failure without a single word. Initially lacking in confidence, you notice his transformation almost entirely through his body language. What’s equally fascinating is how he’s able to create a performance unlike any he’s done before, despite the hundreds and thousands of hours we’ve watched him in before. Add these to AR Rahman’s score and Theni Eswar’s visuals andMaamannanleaves you with several sequences that are impossible to let go of. Despite the compromises in the second half, Mari Selvraj’s third film remains powerful, proving to be a testament to how his voice remains the loudest.

Keerthy Suresh

Udhayanidhi Stalin

Fahadh Faasil

Mari Selvaraj

Vadivelu

Tamil movies

Maamannan

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie (2024)

FAQs

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie? ›

Maamannan Movie Review: A Terrific First Half And Great Performances Salvage An Otherwise Underwhelming Election Movie. There couldn't have been a better opening stretch for a film that speaks the language of Maamannan. An elaborate intercut sequence binds the two worlds that co-exist within the same Salem.

What is the Maamannan story about? ›

Is Maamannan worth watching? ›

Maamannan - 9/10. The third best film that Mari Selvaraj has directed in his career. Nothing wrong with that, and its obviously very hard to top the stupendously brilliant Pariyerum Perumal and the very solid Karnan. Maamannan for the most part is a brilliant political thriller that has some optimism in it.

What is the symbolism in Maamannan? ›

The movie skillfully employs symbolism through animals, specifically dogs and pigs. Rathnavelu, the antagonist, raises aggressive dogs as a reflection of his ego and pride. These dogs are a means to showcase his dominance and superiority, particularly in races.

Is there animal cruelty in the movie Maamannan? ›

An unsympathetic character repeatedly beats a dog using a metal pole, with accompanying blood splatter. In another scene, a pack of dogs are deliberately released into a pigsty and subsequently kill its inhabitants; however, no actual animal cruelty appears to have occurred in the creation of these scenes.

Is Maamannan a hit or flop? ›

Maamannan released on 29 June 2023. The film received positive reviews from critics and grossed ₹52 crore (US$6.5 million) worldwide against a production budget of ₹35 crore (US$4.4 million).

Who is the bad guy in Maamannan? ›

But the film's antagonist Fahadh Faasil grabs the major attention as the skilled actor impresses fans with his cold villain role.

What kind of dog is in Mamannan? ›

The dogs belong to the indigenous breed sighthound that belongs to Tamil Nadu. Maari Selvaraj's first film, Pariyerum Perumal featured a dog from the same breed, which played a vital symbolism in the film.

Is Maamannan on Netflix? ›

'Maamannan' will release on Netflix on July 27, 2023.

Is Thankam worth watching? ›

"thankam" definitely is an amazing crime investigation procedural drama. The performances are awesome, so subtle and natural. Girish Kulkarni is the show stealer, what a performance. Vineeth, biju menon, thattil david and all the other actors who performed gave an amazing performance.

What are the symbolisms in the story? ›

Symbolism is a figure of speech that is used when an author wants to create a certain mood or emotion in a work of literature. It is the use of an object, person, situation or word to represent something else, like an idea, in literature.

What movie had the most animal abuse? ›

"Heaven's Gate" (1980)

Labeling "Heaven's Gate" as "popular" may be a stretch — it notoriously bombed at the box office — but it stands as perhaps the most notorious example of rampant on-set animal abuse.

When did Hollywood stop killing animals in movies? ›

In 1972, the AHA coined the familiar phrase “No Animals Were Harmed,” which appears in the credits of movies. Despite the AHA, the film industry has a long history of animal abuse. In a 1939 Western entitled “Jesse James,” director Henry King sent a horse over a 70-foot cliff resulting in brutal and violent death.

When did animal cruelty become illegal in movies? ›

Cinematograph Films (Animals) Act 1937
Long titleAn Act to prohibit the exhibition or distribution of cinematograph films in connection with the production of which suffering may have been caused to animals; and for purposes connected therewith.
Citation1 Edw. 8. & 1 Geo. 6. c. 59
Dates
Royal assent30 July 1937
7 more rows

Is Maamannan a true story of Dhanapal? ›

In popular culture. Maamannan (2023) by Mari Selvaraj is partly based on his real life story.

Is the movie Mamannan based on a true story? ›

The director also revealed that the core of the film is based on a real-life incident which happened 15 days right after his first film Paraiyerum Perumal was released. When he was asked about the incident, Mari refused to tell as it might be a spoiler for the film.

Are Maamannan and nayakudu the same? ›

Mari Selvaraj's Tamil film, Maamannan, which opened to mixed to positive reviews last week, is now set to be released in Telugu. The film's Telugu title is Nayakudu, meaning leader.

Who are the actors in Maamannan story? ›

Udhayanidhi Stalin, Keerthi Suresh, Vadivelu, and Fahadh Faasil starred in the lead roles, along with Geetha Kailasam and many others in supporting roles. In this flick, Vadivelu carried out the movie's most compelling character while fully breaking his humorous talents.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Eusebia Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5895

Rating: 5 / 5 (60 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Eusebia Nader

Birthday: 1994-11-11

Address: Apt. 721 977 Ebert Meadows, Jereville, GA 73618-6603

Phone: +2316203969400

Job: International Farming Consultant

Hobby: Reading, Photography, Shooting, Singing, Magic, Kayaking, Mushroom hunting

Introduction: My name is Eusebia Nader, I am a encouraging, brainy, lively, nice, famous, healthy, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.